|
|
Natural Law as the Foundation of All Religions
Objective standard for assessing religions: Natural
Law is a universal set of principles that governs all human behavior.
Our effectiveness is predicated upon certain inviolate principles—
natural laws in the human dimension that are just as real, just as unchanging,
as laws such as gravity are in the physical dimension. These principles
are woven into the fabric of every civilized society and constitute the
roots of every family and institution that has endured and prospered.
Principles are not invented by us or by society; they are the
laws of the universe that pertain to human relationships and human organizations.
They are part of the human condition, consciousness, and conscience.
…The lesson of history is that to the degree people and civilizations
have operated in harmony with correct principles, they have prospered.
At the root of societal declines are foolish practices that represent violations
of correct principles. How many economic disasters, intercultural conflicts,
political revolutions, and civil wars could have been avoided had there
been greater social commitment to correct principles? (Stephen Covey, Principle-Centered
Leadership, 1991, 18-19)
The Declaration of Independence applies Natural Law to human rights:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." The Bill
of Rights of the United States Constitution, which are the ultimate foundation
of our country's laws, rests on Natural Law. The Bill of Rights includes:
-
Freedom of nonviolent expression (freedom of speech)
-
Freedom of religion (as opposed to putting Christian missionaries on trial
for their lives as the Taliban did, or prescribing execution for converts
as is done in Saudi Arabia and the Sudan)
-
The right to keep and bear arms for defense of family, self, and country
-
Freedom from unreasonable (without a warrant or probable cause) search
-
The right to not give evidence against oneself
-
The right to trial by a jury of one's peers (as opposed to a king, or a
religious Sharia court)
-
Freedom from cruel and unusual punishments (like amputation of limbs, stoning,
and crucifixion, all of which are practiced in the Arab world)
-
Freedom from involuntary servitude (slavery, which is still practiced in
the Arab world, e.g. in the Sudan)
The famous Chinese general Wu Ch'i (430-381 BCE) wrote, "Now what is called
'The Right Way' is the return to fundamental principles… If conduct is
not in accord with 'The Right Way' and action not in accord with Righteousness,
then albeit one's position is important and honorable, misfortune will
overtake him" (Sun Tzu, Samuel Griffith translation, 1963, 152).
Natural Law is so important that Asian Indians deify it as Dharma, "The
Right Way." It's Tao (the Way) to Chinese, and Do (same as Tao) in Japan.
China, a Third World dictatorship, is ruled by tyrants as opposed to Taoists
or Confucian scholars. Hindus say that Dharma protects those who uphold
it and destroys those who go against it. In fact, the definition
of Natural Law allows an objective definition of good and evil. Whatever
supports and uphold Natural Law is good, whatever goes against it is evil.
Far from competing or conflicting with each other, the seven major religions
shown here support, reinforce, and validate one another.
Judaism
The ancient Hebrews were, by modern standards, very horrible people. (Then
again, so were their contemporaries like the Assyrians, Persians, Egyptians,
and Greeks.) The Old Testament says that God told the Hebrews to "smite"
entire races, and even to kill their women and children.
On the other hand, the ancient Hebrews developed the Ten Commandments:
a code of law whose basis was Natural Law. The Commandments prescribed
how people should behave toward each other, as opposed to obedience to
a king or a central government. Although the ancient Hebrews had slaves
(like everyone else in those day; Greek city-states were democratic only
for their citizens), their laws actually accorded slaves some rights.
Judaism changed with the times. With very few fringe-element
exceptions, modern Jews do not believe in "smiting" other races. Jews are
tolerant of other religions; it was under Jewish occupation of Jerusalem
that the city first opened to Christian as well as Jewish pilgrims.
Modern Judaism rests firmly on the foundation of Natural Law. |
Christianity
Jesus, the founder of Christianity, was a nonviolent teacher and philosopher.
He preached a way of peace and reconciliation. Luke 6:27 says "…Love your
enemies, do good to them which hate you."
Like Judaism, Christianity changed with the times, but for the worse.
Christians suffered persecution by the Romans but, once Rome became Christian,
it began to persecute "pagans." Pagens were compelled to convert, often
at the point of a sword. The "wrong" kinds of Christians were persecuted
for "heresy."
Medieval times saw the Crusades and, after the Reformation, the Inquisition
and the Thirty Years War. Medieval Christians were capable of enormous
violence in the name of God.
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, however, saw a move toward
greater tolerance of all religious faiths. The Catholic Church is reconciling
itself with Jews and Protestants. Modern Christians, like their religion's
founder, prefer just peace to war, whether just or unjust. Modern Christianity
rests firmly on the foundation of Natural Law. |
|
Hinduism
Natural Law is so important to Hindus that they personify it as a god,
Dharma: "Right Conduct" or "The Right Way." Those who uphold Dharma are
supported by it, while those who try to undermine Dharma are destroyed
by it. This is because governmental and social systems that go against
Natural Law are so dysfunctional that they cannot survive, and they will
eventually fall of their own weight. |
Buddhism
Gautama, the Buddha ("Enlightened One") was the founder of Buddhism and
the bringer of the Bodi-Dharma ("Good Law," similar to what Christians
call the Gospel or Good News).
The Buddhist Dhammapada (Mascarò 1973, 35) says, "For hate is
not conquered by hate: hate is conquered by love." (See Luke 6:27 above) |
Confucism
From the Analects of Confucius
"The Master [Confucius] said, He who rules by moral force (té)
is like the pole star, which remains in its place while all the lesser
stars do homage to it. …"
"The Master said, Govern the people by regulations, keep order among
them by chastisements, and they will flee from you, and lose all self-respect.
Govern
them by moral force [that is, in accordance with Natural Law], keep
order among them by ritual and they will keep their self-respect and come
to you of their own accord." |
Taoism
Taoism simply means following the Tao, or Way. Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching
says, (LXIII) "Do good to him who has done you an injury" (See above; this
suggests that Christianity, Buddhism, and Taoism have a common origin.)
"Man models himself on earth,/ Earth on heaven,/ Heaven on the way,/
And the way on that which is naturally so." The final stanza of this verse
suggests natural law; "that which is naturally so." This verse also suggests
that natural law is Heaven's Way. |
Islam
Unlike the founder of Christianity, the founder of Islam was not a man
of peace:
Muhammed was not only a warrior himself, who had been wounded
in a battle at Medina against the men of Mecca in 625. He preached as well
as practiced war. In his last visit to Mecca in 632 he laid down that,
though all Muslims were brethren and should not fight each other [tell
that to the Sunnis and Shiites], they should fight all other men until
they said, "There is no God but God."
Muhammed, by contrast [to Jesus], had been a merchant, had a keen understanding
of the value of wealth, properly used, expected the umma [Muslim community]
to accumulate it and saw it as a method of doing good, both collectively
and individually. He himself raided the caravans of the rich, unbelieving
merchants of Mecca, and spent the loot to further his cause. This was
an example that his holy warriors followed in their assaults on the rich
kingdoms of Byzantium and Persia.
...There could be no territoriality in Islam, because its destiny was
to bring the whole world to submission to the will of God. ...Only when
the whole of the House of War [Dar el-Harb, everything outside the House
of Islam, or Dar el-Islam] has been brought within the House of Submission
would Islam's destiny be complete. (John Keegan, A History of Warfare)
In other words, Islam's original destiny, as proclaimed by
its founder, was to conquer the entire Earth. While "Non-believers
[dhimmis] who were prepared to live under Koranic authority were positively
entitled to protection and, in strict theory, those outside the umma who
kept the peace ought not to be attacked," in practice anything outside
the umma belonged to the Dar el-Harb, the House of War.
Like Judaism and Christianity, Islam has changed with the times in
places like Turkey and the United States. Turks and Muslim-Americans
have no desire to bring the world into the Dar el-Islam; they want to be
productive citizens and earn good livings like the vast majority of other
Westernized people. Militant "Islam," however, still subscribes to this
position, as reinforced repeatedly by militant "Islamic" preachers. "A
Muslim imam, calling on Allah to 'annihilate the Jews and their supporters,'
envisioned a day when all the lands of the earth will be 'owned by the
Muslim nation,' as broadcast live on Palestinian Authority television."
(Worldnetdaily.com)
This sounds a lot like Hitler's plans for his Thousand Year Reich, although
even his ambitions didn't extend to the entire world.
| Omdurman.org accordingly recognizes mainstream Islam, whose foundation
is Natural Law and respect for the natural human rights of all people,
as a constructive and positive force for good: just like Judaism, Christianity,
Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucism. Militant "Islam," however, treats
unbelievers within its borders as "dhimmis" and those outside its borders
as the Dar el-Harb, the House of War. Shaitaniyah [Satanic] militant
"Islamic"
mufsidoon [evildoers] commit tajdeef [blasphemy
against Allah] by using Islam to justify hirabah [forbidden killing
of innocents, e.g. through terrorism, or morally sinful war against society].
Omdurman.org considers these mufsidoon threats to civilized humanity
itself. |
Omdurman.org:
the Internet's Battle of Omdurman, against barbarism and terror in the
name of religion-- any religion
|