Oxfam Solidarity's moral support to terrorism
Action Platform Palestine and Greta Duisenberg
Participation in overt anti- Semitic activities
Oxfam Solidarity wants a boycott of all Israeli products
Oxfam Wereldwinkels boycotting U.S., siding with Saddam Hussein
Letters to Oxfam International
|
|
O
fam Belgium and
Don't like the swastika
in Oxfam? See the
image below, from Oxfam Solidarity's friends at inminds.co.uk
|
Page Contents
- The Problem: Oxfam Belgium (or Oxfam
Solidarity) is giving moral aid and support to Palestinian terrorists
- Oxfam Belgium is in bed with Actieplateform
Palestina, whose agenda is blatantly anti-Israel
- What is Actieplateform
Palestina (Action Platform Palestine)? Greta Duisenberg, wife of
the European Central Bank CEO, is praised by an Islamic
media source that refuses to spell out the word "Israel." Artwork includes
a dagger through the Star of David and the United
States and Russia as vampires "feeding on the Islamic umma (community).
- Oxfam Belgium says Jerusalem is the
capital of Palestine
- Oxfam Belgium supports "Palestinian Right
of Return"
- Allegations of participation in
overtly anti-Semitic activities. "Oxfam Belgium is the partner of
the AEL, who called up for the anti-Semitic demonstrations in Antwerp,
where a puppet representing an orthodox Jew was burned in
public."
- Evidence of Oxfam Solidarity participation in a boycott of ALL Israeli products: Jaffa (Haifa) is one
of the "occupied territories," we suppose. And perhaps Tel Aviv is, too.
- Belgian Oxfam entities also boycotting
the United States
- Letters sent to Ian Anderson (the
one who's the head of Oxfam, not the flute player of Jethro Tull).
- "Sometimes you have to amputate a diseased limb
or excise a cancerous organ to save the rest of the body. Oxfam International
has cancer and the tumor is Oxfam Belgium."
- "As long as Oxfam Belgium continues the basic
activity, the boycott of Israeli goods from the occupied territories,
'apologizing for any offense that might have been given'
means about as much as a Japanese prison guard's 'so sorry' to an American
or British prisoner he had just beaten."
|
Update: 31 July 2003. Omdurman.org withdraws its call for
a boycott of Oxfam International, in view of Oxfam International's repudiation
of
Oxfam Solidarity's behavior.
http://www.wiesenthal.com/social/press/pr_item.cfm?ItemID=7996
(Letter from Oxfam International to the Wiesenthal Center): "...the
leadership of the Oxfam International felt that the core messages of the
Belgian campaign were unclear and inappropriate. Oxfam International regrets
our association with these messages and images and sincerely apologizes for
any offense caused. We would like to underline that this was not an Oxfam
International campaign or position. To be explicit, Oxfam International does
not support a public campaign for a boycott of Israeli produce."
Other Web pages
|
Oxfam Belgium calls for an anti-Israel
boycott http://www.oxfamsol.be/eng/boycott.htm
The boycott of Israeli goods produced
in the Occupied Territories: a boycott for peace
The
position of Oxfam-Solidarity
Together
with 15 Belgian NGOs, Oxfam-Solidarity calls for boycotting Israeli
goods produced in the Occupied Territories.
...Our
aim is to express our opposition to the policy of Israeli Government
towards the Palestinians which upholds occupation of their territory
and includes acts of grave violence, which we believe is the main
cause for the continuing conflict.
We have consistently condemned and called for an end to Palestinian
suicide bombings and other acts of terror which violate the 4th
protocole of the Geneva Convention. [This is lip service. Oxfam Solidarity
does not call for a boycott of the Palestinian Authority despite ongoing
acts of violence by Palestinian terrorists.]
"You're
either with us or you're with the terrorists." Evidence that Oxfam Solidarity
is with the terrorists.
Oxfam Solidarity links the following Web site: Visit the "Actieplateform Palestina"
website
The APP regrets the daily violence of this conflict and condemns the
killing of innocent citizen victims on both sides. As for the APP,
this violent conflict is caused by the Israeli occupation of Palestinian
territories. And a solution can only be reached if and when this occupation
has come to an end. Therefore, the APP sides resolutely with the Palestinian
people and the Israeli peace organisations.
Note that Actieplateform Palestina says nothing about ongoing
acts of terrorism by Palestinians, acts that have made the Israeli occupation
a reasonable and necessary act of self-defense. Now let's look at Actieplateform
Palestina's political demands.
Belgium is responsible to ensure that the EU
a. increases the pressure on Israel
b. relies on this international
law when taking any diplomatic initiative
Nothing here about pressuring the Palestinians to stop blowing up Seders,
buses, schools, dance halls, stores, and so on...
a. An immediate and unconditional
suspension of the geographical and demographic elaboration of the Jewish
settlements and by-pass roads on the West Bank (including Eastern Jerusalem)
and Gaza. The dismantlement should be negotiated
b. Lift of the blockades
on Palestinian villages, cities and territories.
c. Suspension of the
military aggression towards and executions of Palestinians
d. Implementation of
the agreements of Taba (Oslo II) relating to the transfer of tax revenues
to the Palestinian authorities
e. Suspension of all
violations of human rights
- "Unconditional?" They mean that it's not conditional on
the Palestinians ceasing to blow up Seders, buses, schools, dance halls,
stores, and so on?
- "Lift the blockades?" In other words, Israel should allow
the free passage of murderers and terrorists?
- "Suspension of military aggression toward and execution
of Palestinians." Israel should not defend itself against people who
blow up Seders, buses, schools, dance halls, stores, and so on. Israel
has no death penalty and Israel has never held a capital court-martial
of any captured terrorist.
- Masquerading as civilians makes terrorists spies under
international law even if they do nothing else, and they can be executed
for this alone. Intentional murder of Israeli civilians is a capital
war crime, and murder is also a capital civilian crime in many U.S. jurisdictions.
Omdurman.org's position is that terrorists should be tried by capital
court martial and executed upon conviction for masquerading as civilians
and/or attacking Israeli civilians.
- "Suspension of all violation of human rights," except apparently
for the right of Israeli men, women, and children to be secure against
being murdered in their own homes or in public places.
Steps to be taken immediately and certainly by the Belgian government
and the European Union:
a. Suspension of the Association
agreement between the EU and Israel that accords trade benefits to
the import of Israeli products. The association-agreement itself stipulates
after all that its implementation is linked to the respect to human
rights and the democratic principles (article 2) and that no products
from Jewish settlements are to be imported (article 83). Both stipulations
are not respected by Israel.
b. * A formal ban on
the export of arms:
- from Belgium to Israel, in application of article 4 of
the Belgian law.
- from the EU to Israël, in application of several
criteria of the European Code of Conduct
* A formal ban on the import of arms from Israel to Belgium
and the European Union, including the suspension or destruction of still
running or already closed contracts.
c. Within the UN a continued
urge to establish a UN-protection force that positions itself along
the green demarcation line of 1949.
d. A call upon the Israeli
government to account for the violations of the human rights and the
use of excessive violence towards the Palestinian people
Note that they say nothing about the export of arms to the Palestinian
Authority, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigade, Islamic Jihad,
or Al Qaida. As for the demarcation line of 1949, it would have been really
nice if Actieplateform Palestina's Arab friends had honored that line in
1949 instead of trying to "throw the Jews into the sea."
4. The final goal of the negotiations should be:
a. The total withdrawal
of the Israeli army from all occupied territories (West Bank, Gaza and
Eastern Jerusalem)
b. The evacuation and dismantlement
of the Jewish settlements in the occupied territories, and the compensation
of the damage Palestinians suffered due to the occupier and the colonists
c. The installation of
a sovereign and democratic Palestinian state that is politically and
economically liveable
d. Equal rights for the
others on each other's territory. For Israel this means the equal treatment
of the own Palestinian citizens, which comes down to abolishing discriminating
laws and customs, returning stolen land and so on.
e. The claim of return
and/or compensation of Palestinian refugees
f. A fair regulation
The Palestinian "right of return" is a well-known
ploy to overrun Israel with Palestinians, as opposed to placing these
Palestinians in their new "homeland." What we have here is pretty good
evidence that Actieplateform Palestina is a front for Palestinian ambitions.
It may even be a front for militant "Islamic" Arab states. This will
be researched further.
What is Actieplateform
Palestina (Action Platform Palestine)?
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/Other%20Updates/other_update_cover.htm
The visit was organized by Holland’s Palestine
Solidarity Group – “Stop the Occupation”, of which
Gretta Druisenberg is Chair. Other organizations involved
in the visit were Medical Aid for the Third World; Doctors
for Peace (Flemish Division of International Physicians for the
Prevention of Nuclear War); the Flemish Action Platform
Palestine and CODIP (Center for the Development,
Documentation and Information Palestinians).
So APP is in league with a "Palestine Solidarity Group." Who
is Greta Duisenberg?
Well "Islam Online" seems to like her:
http://www.islamonline.net/english/news/2003-01/12/article16.shtml
"The Israeli occupation was worse than
Nazi Germany's occupation of the Netherlands, Greta was quoted
by a Dutch newspaper as saying."
The fact that she is still breathing after making
this remark in the "occupied territories" proves that she is a liar.
Anyone who criticized genuine Nazis in occupied Holland found themselves
on a one-way trip to an "arbeit macht frei" camp.
Meanwhile, Wafa’ Bobnad, Chairwoman of
the sponsor committee of Arab Women festival, scheduled on
March 6 through 9, told IslamOnline that the festival would
lionize Greta in the closing ceremony.
"This praise comes in appreciation from
the Arab and Muslim community for her pains-taking efforts,
which serve best the Palestinian cause, and to assert
that all Arab and Muslim women in the Netherlands are rallying
behind her in her uphill struggle against the brutal campaigns launched
by the Zionists and their followers," Bobnad said.
In April 2002 , Duisenberg hung a Palestinian
flag from the balcony of her house in Amsterdam.
Boycott Israel News-- that's boycott Israel,
not the occupied territories-- praises Greta Duisenberg at http://www.inminds.co.uk/boycott-news-0181.html
Organizers said hanging the Palestinian flags was also an act of
solidarity with Greta Duisenberg, wife of the European Central
Bank CEO, who has been recently sued for insisting on
hanging the Palestinian flag outside the balcony of her
home in an upper class neighborhood in Amsterdam.
Duisenberg took part in a demonstration April 13 in solidarity
with the Palestinian Intifada. She decided to keep the Palestinian
flag outside her home balcony as an expression of her
sympathy with the Palestinian resistance and their legitimate
right to an independent state, and her rejection of the
Isr**li aggressions against the Palestinian people.
Note that this organization won't spell out the word "Israel," perhaps
because it doesn't recognize Israel's right to exist. I thought
it was a misprint but see two more examples below:
She is unhappy with the way Holland and Europe have been dealing
with hardline Isr**li Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s government’s
actions in Palestinian cities during the last few weeks,
she said, adding that she insists on her position.
“I am an independent thinking woman and responsible for my
actions. Both my husband and I own this house which means I can
practice my beliefs here,” she said.
Dutch papers have recently attacked Muslim protestors who burnt
the Isr**li flag in pro-Palestinian demonstrations that
were held in the Dutch capital during the month of April.
They saw these demonstrations as an indication of the end
of the Jewish control over the city and the start of a new
era in which Muslims are in control.
The mayor of Amsterdam, Cohen, of Jewish origins, appeared in the
Dutch media angry at the burning of the Isr**li flag
in his city, which is the first time this has taken place
ever since Isr**l came into existence in 1947.
Despite their being a minority, Jews exercise a lot of political
and economic influence in the Netherland. They also control the
media. The Dutch authorities have always appointed a
Jewish mayor for the city in recognition of the role
that was played by the Jews in the flourishing of the
city. They arrived as refugees with the start of Inquisition,
following the fall of Muslim Spain (Al-Andalus) in the fifteenth
century.
The recent events in Palestine and the second Intifada against
Isr**li occupation have pushed the Muslim minority in the
city to surmount their differences and to unite in huge
demonstrations which many felt threatened the “Jewish
indentity” of the city.
So we have a very fascinating trail
here: Oxfam Solidarity/ Oxfam Belgium ==> Action Platform Palestine
==> Greta Duisenberg ==> "Boycott Israel," a site that won't even
spell out the word "Israel" because it obviously doesn't recognize Israel's
right to exist!
|
Here is some artwork from Boycott Israel News' host site http://www.inminds.co.uk/resources.html.
Note regarding copyright: Omdurman.org believes this to be "fair use"
because the purpose is to show the political stance of http://www.inminds.co.uk/resources.html
and these images are not presented for sale, or as a substitute for purchase.
(The images are advertisements for artwork that can be purchased from http://www.inminds.co.uk/
and are not themselves for sale as artwork.) The Violence Policy Center
has, incidentally, been able to put complete copies of gun magazine covers
and firearm advertisements on its Web site for similar purposes. I notified
the magazines and gun companies in question but they were apparently not
able to accuse the VPC, which is quite hostile to their interests, of
copyright infringement.
A dagger through the Star of David: how quaint. Note
that the demonstration is against Israel, not the "occupation." Nice
company that Oxfam Belgium keeps, isn't it?
They also sell a book that apparently praises mass murderer Ayatollah
Khomeini, who held American citizens hostage during 1979.
|
The one on the right is also from Greta Duisenberg's and Oxfam
Solidarity's friends. Title: The Vampires of the West and East all
feeding on the Muslim Ummah. Note how the Great Satan is in the front
(I bet these guys are unhappy that Flight 93 didn't make it to that dome
on September 11, 2001) and the Lesser Satan is in the background.
|
|
Palestinian supporters' recommendation for
a Sirhan-Sirhan-style "regime change" in the United States.
http://www.inminds.co.uk/ home page. Sirhan, the convicted
assassin of Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy, is a Palestinian.
The word "assassin" itself (Hashisheen, hashish-user) also is Arabic
in origin. http://www.inminds.co.uk displays this image in a manner that
suggests approval, not condemnation, of a terroristic threat against
the President of the United States. It presents this image on its home
page among other pro-Palestinian images; that is, the context is one of
approval as opposed to condemnation.
Note the nearby "Freedom for Palestine" sign and remember Aesop's
fable. "Birds of a feather flock together."
|
Don't like "O
xfam Solidarity?"
Re: inminds.com copyright. Again, this
image (actually, half of the original) is displayed for the noncommercial
and educational purpose of showing the positions that inminds.co.uk apparently
endorses. In other words, I don't think they can use their copyright to
prevent me from showing their denouncement of Israel as an "illegal
fascist state," as well as their use of swastikas with regard to both
Israel and the United States. Recall that the Violence Policy Center could
apparently display entire gun magazine covers and firearm advertisements
for similar purposes without being in violation of the copyright owners'
rights. I am no friend of the VPC and I brought this to the attention of
the copyright owners, but they apparently had no recourse against the
VPC's noncommercial and "educational" use of the material. In addition,
the watermark "Illustration of material that promotes hatred of the U.S.
and Israel" has been added to this image to prevent its use for any purpose
other than the one I have described.
The deleted portion of the image says, "Blair must go." I suppose
these people don't like the fact that Blair supported the removal of Saddam
Hussein.
http://www.inminds.co.uk/palestine-rally-1-17may03.html
|
Oxfam Solidarity says Jerusalem is
the capital of Palestine
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/appeals/oxfam_solidarity_belgium___urgen.htm
Oxfam-Solidarity Belgium calls upon the international community
and the European Governments to take urgently the following steps:
...The strengthening of the political pressure on the Israeli
government to enforce the various UN-resolutions (242,338,194 ): the immediate
withdrawal of the Israeli occupation forces from all 1967 occupied Palestinian
and Arab territories, the return of the Palestinian refugees and the
establishment of a sovereign, independent Palestinian State in the 1967
occupied territories with Jerusalem as its capital.
Oxfam Solidarity supports Palestinian "right
of return" to Israel proper
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oiap/message/278
Oxfam supports "right of return"
Note that Oxfam Solidarity is the organizer and not a mere participant.
The European Campaign:
A strategy workshop organized by Oxfam Solidarity/Belgium between
March 29 and 1 April 1999 set the foundations for two Palestinian-European
Campaigns, a
campaign for Palestinian Economic Development, and a Campaign for
Palestinian Refugee Rights. Participants were Palestinian and European
NGOs (BADIL Resource Center, Forum of Palestinian NGOs-Lebanon, PARC, Belgo-Palestinian
Association, Flamish Palestine Committee, Oxfam Solidarity, UCL
CERMAC, a.o.), representatives of the ECCP, Belgian parliamentarians and
trade unionists, representatives of the European parliament and EU commissions,
and PLO and Arab League representatives. The Campaign for Palestinian Refugee
Rights will:
- Empower Palestinian refugee initiatives and NGOs;
- Advocate for the Palestinian right of return;
- Lobby for increased government support for UNRWA.
http://www.badil.org/Press/2000/press106-00.htm
"There will be no peace in the Middle East without recognition
of Palestinian refugees' right of return, because Palestinian refugees,
i.e. two thirds of the Palestinian people, reject a solution of the Palestinian
refugee question which does not meet the standards set by international
law and UN Resolution 194."
"The delegation, composed of BADIL Program Coordinator Muhammad
Jaradat and international refugee law expert Susan Akram, was hosted
and assisted by Brussels-based Oxfam Solidarity, the European Coordinating
Committee on Palestine (ECCP), and by the Palestine working groups in
the Belgian and European parliament."
Allegations of participation in overt
anti-Semitic activities
http://www.desinfo.be/ad_dossierX/Do_X_visu.asp?ID=352
says,
Oxfam Belgium is the partner of the AEL, who called up for the
anti-Semitic demonstrations in Antwerp, where a puppet representing
an orthodox Jew was burned in public.
Oxfam Belgium is part of the Flemish Palestine Platform that stated
on the website: the bomb-attack are a fait divers.
Oxfam Belgium participates in a lie-campaign about Israel (several
of their statements are wrong, such as: that 3.5 million were expulsed
in 1948)
Oxfam has written an open letter to the Jewish community in Belgium
to justify their boycott but also let them understand " that Israel
is a country that is not worth to life neither to exist!
---------------------------------------------------------
In the anti-Israel demonstration of June 8th in Antwerp (they
call it a pro-palestinian demonstration...) to which OXFAM was a co-organisor,
several masked demonstrators burned a puppet. We have now full confirmation
that the puppet had black clothes, a kippa and was definitely designed
to represent an orthodox jew and not Sharon neither Buish! [I think he
means "Bush"] Your local delegates did not react in any way to that action
and therefor we can only assume that they endorsed this very antisemitic
and racist act in Antwerp!"
Oxfam Solidarity implicated in boycott
of all Israeli products, not just those from the "occupied territories"
From http://www.solidarite-palestine.org/cbi004.html
BOYCOTT DES PRODUITS ISRAÉLIENS ("Boycott Israeli Products")
La Campagne de Boycott en Belgique ("The boycott campaign in Belgium")
"We call with the boycott of all the Israeli products by
laying a particular stress on the agricultural produce."
Traduction : Magasins du Monde - OXFAM ("Translation:
Magazine of the World- OXFAM")
http://www.madeindignity.be/public/en/00.htm
This page calls for the boycott of, among other things, oranges
from Jaffa (Haifa). I wonder if Oxfam Solidarity defines Haifa as an
"occupied territory." Well, if they were using the Arab map of "Palestine"
shown at right, I suppose it is. Along with Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Israel's
a lot harder to find on this map than Waldo in "Where's Waldo." That's because
Waldo is IN the pictures in "Where's Waldo."
Belgian Oxfam entities also boycotting
the United States (in favor of Saddam Hussein)
http://www.motherearth.org/USboycott/
By boycotting US products, I want to put pressure on the US government
to join the international community, complying with the rules of the United
Nations and international law. With the military attack and invasion of
Iraq in March 2003 the US acted as a rogue state. [These guys
are calling our country, the most free democracy in the world, a "rogue
state." What do they call the Butcher of Baghdad, an "enlightened humanitarian?"]
With the attack the US violated the UN charter. Today
more than ever US companies seem to have a major impact on the policy of
the US administration. The US government policy has increasingly been marked
by arrogance and self-interest:
The unilateral policies of the US must stop now and all US troops must
leave Iraq immediately. [Right, leave the place to Saddam's Fedayeen and
death squad holdovers!]
(Partial list of supporters: note how all the scum seem to congregate
in the same sewer.)
Belgium
KP Kommunistische Partij [KP Communist Party]
Oxfam Wereldwinkel Gent Centrum
Oxfam Wereldwinkel Gent West
Oxfam Wereldwinkel Herzele
Letters to Oxfam International
To: information "at" oxfaminternational.org (Ian Anderson, head of Oxfam) CC: oxfam "at" oxfam.org.uk, info "at" oxfamamerica.org, information "at" wiesenthal.net, oxfamsol "at" oxfamsol.be (wiesenthal.net is the Simon Wiesenthal Center)
Dear Mr. Ian Anderson,
I spoke with Oxfam USA today, and I understand clearly that Oxfam
USA has nothing to do with Oxfam Belgium's anti-Israel boycott. I am
sure the British group has nothing to do with it either. Nonetheless, your
Belgian group has put the "Oxfam" label on this activity. Sometimes
you have to amputate a diseased limb or excise a cancerous organ to save
the rest of the body. Oxfam International has cancer and the tumor is Oxfam
Belgium.
Oxfam International now (through no fault of its own) finds itself
in the position of harboring a rogue organization for whose actions
the entire Oxfam organization will be held accountable if you do not
cut them loose. "Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."
Oxfam Belgium is with the terrorists and, if Oxfam International continues
to allow Oxfam Belgium to use Oxfam's name, then Oxfam International is
with the terrorists. Oxfam will lose all moral credibility and people
around the world will rightly cut their financial support. If this were
to happen, my advice to Oxfam America would be to wash its hands of the
international organization and go its separate way.
To Ian Anderson,
Dear Mr. Anderson,
The Wiesenthal Center directed my attention to the following
Web page:
http://www.oxfamsol.be/eng/boycott.htm
The boycott of Israeli goods produced in the Occupied Territories:
a boycott for peace The position of Oxfam-Solidarity
Together with 15 Belgian NGOs, Oxfam-Solidarity calls for boycotting
Israeli goods produced in the Occupied Territories.
-------------------------------
The above Web page also contains a direct link to a pro-Palestinian
Web site, http://www.11.be/index.htm?palestina/index.htm&2.
The site calls for action by Belgium and the EU against Israel
(but not against the Palestinian Authority for terroristic acts). As
President Bush said, "You're either with us or you're with the terrorists,"
and it's pretty clear that these people (Actieplatform Palestina)
are with the terrorists. And Oxfam Belgium seems to be with Actieplatform
Palestina. My questions to you (and Oxfam America) are as follows:
(1) Will Oxfam Belgium continue to be part of Oxfam International
if Oxfam Belgium continues to take sides in the Israel/Palestinian controversy
and promote a boycott of Israeli products?
(2) Is Oxfam Belgium encouraging American businesses and corporations,
as well as individuals, to boycott Israeli goods?
(3) Will Oxfam America separate from Oxfam International if the
latter tolerates the political activities of Oxfam Belgium?
------------------------------
Although certain Belgians may like terrorists and militant "Islamic"
dictators-- Belgium also wanted to indict my country's President and
general (Tommy Franks) for waging war in Iraq under strict adherence
to the Geneva and Hague Conventions, while having nothing to say about
Saddam Hussein's feeding political prisoners into a plastic shredder,
his vicious son Uday throwing a woman to his attack dogs when she ceased
to "please" him, and "Chemical Ali" using poison gas to commit genocide
(Kurds, I believe)-- we do not like them over here. Terrorists murdered
3000 of us a couple of years ago, and there was also the matter of the U.S.S.
"Cole" and the Marine barracks in Beirut.
July 17 2003
Dear Mr. Anderson,
I read your reply to my concerns about Oxfam Belgium, and I saw the
cosmetic changes that Oxfam Belgium made at http://www.oxfamsol.be/eng/boycott.htm.
Furthermore, the cosmetic changes reflect only a response to political
considerations (international pressure from opponents of terrorism) and
not a change of conscience by Oxfam Belgium. Although the link to the
Palestinian Action Platform (Actieplatform Palestina) has been removed,
an image that promotes APP remains on the site. That is, Oxfam Belgium
apparently did the bare minimum it thought it could get away with.
Oxfam Belgium does not regret its misdeeds, it regrets getting caught.
As long as Oxfam Belgium continues the basic activity, the boycott of
Israeli goods from the occupied territories, "apologizing for any
offense that might have been given" means about as much as a Japanese
prison guard's "so sorry" to an American or British prisoner he had just
beaten.
Furthermore, Oxfam Belgium's "We have consistently condemned and called
for an end to Palestinian suicide bombings and other acts of terror which
violate the 4th protocol of the Geneva Convention and are clearly compromising
the peace process in the region" is mere lip service, as Oxfam Belgium
is not calling for a boycott of Palestinian goods while these violent activities
continue. Yassir Arafat has given similar lip service to condemnation
of homicide bombings (depending on the political climate, e.g. when he
wanted a Nobel Peace Prize) although it is well known that he could turn
the bombings on and off as if he was operating a light switch. This is
an issue I raised when I called Oxfam International, and it was not addressed
by your office. Nor have the E-mails I have received from you or other
Oxfam entities addressed this. Although Oxfam Belgium says it is against
violence by either side, its coercive activities are directed only at
Israel so, quite frankly, I simply don't believe Oxfam Belgium.
I do accept your own statement,
"Oxfam's mission is to respond to the suffering of people, without
regard to
race, religion or ethnicity. Oxfam supports the Road Map for peace.
We
condemn Palestinian suicide bombings and all other acts of terror and
violence. We call for the occupation of the Palestinian territories
to end."
as honest and even-handed. One must recognize, however, that the two
problems-- suicide bombings and the occupation-- are connected. Israel
probably has no desire to remain in the occupied territories and have
her troops subjected to terrorist activities (noting that a guerrilla who
dresses as a civilian is a war criminal under international
law). This is especially true because Israel puts her soldiers at risk
to minimize harm to innocent civilians, e.g. fighting terrorists house-to-house
instead of flattening their positions with bombs and artillery. (House-to-house
fighting is a soldier's worst nightmare. U.S. troops suffered enormous
simulated losses in training exercises for this contingency in Iraq, and
we are now losing soldiers to urban terrorism in that country.)
The occupation is necessary, however, as long as the territories in
question are used for the purpose of launching terrorist attacks in Israel
proper. Recall that my own country invaded Mexico in 1916 because Mexico
could not control cross-border banditry by Pancho Villa. I don't even
think Pancho Villa blew up churches (as the Palestinians did to an Israeli
seder), dance halls, or stores with innocent people inside; he merely
robbed and stole. Nonetheless, a military invasion was a reasonable and
necessary act of self-defense by the United States.
Here are some contrasts to Oxfam Belgium's claim to be for "peace."
(1) Henry Ford (about whom I've published a book) made a good-faith
effort to stop the First World War by appealing to both sides, as opposed
to boycotting the goods of one side or sending monetary aid to the other.
(2) U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt helped negotiate an end to the
Russo-Japanese War, as opposed to boycotting the goods of either Russia
or Japan (in "occupied territories" like Manchuria or otherwise).
(3) Otto von Bismarck assumed the role of an "honest broker" in Europe.
Since Oxfam Belgium's coercive activities (boycott of Israeli goods
in the occupied territories) are directed only at Israel and not at violent
Palestinian militants, it is obvious that Oxfam Belgium is on the side
of the Palestinian militants. Oxfam Belgium is therefore, I believe, an
organization that provides second-hand moral comfort and support to terrorists.
"Second-hand" means that, although Oxfam Belgium's words do not support
terrorism, its deeds (boycott of Israeli goods from the occupied territories
because of objections to the occupation, but no boycott of Palestinian goods
despite verbal objection to terrorism) do support terrorism. Furthermore,
I don't see how Oxfam International can lend its name to second-hand support
of terrorism and retain the good will of Americans and others who consider
terrorism a menace to civilized humanity. Oxfam performs valuable humanitarian
work, but so do other organizations that do not give second-hand support
to terrorism, and generous Americans can redirect their charity from Oxfam
to those other organizations. (Oxfam America, which stated an opposition
to the boycott, may be another matter.)
There is a simple way to avoid this kind of problem:
(1) Oxfam Belgium can repudiate its boycott entirely (recommended,
neutrality is best for a supposedly-humanitarian organization like Oxfam)
(2) Oxfam Belgium can add a boycott of Palestinian goods so as to be
even-handed. (Again, #1 is better)
(3) If the leaders of Oxfam Belgium are sympathetic to the Palestinians,
they should conduct those activities as private individuals and not
through Oxfam. They are free to join Actieplatform Palestina, the International
Solidarity Movement, or even Al Qaida for all I care, as long as they
don't call themselves Oxfam.
Regards, (and hoping to remain Oxfam International's friend),
W.A.L.
|