In its eagerness to sing “Kumbaya” with Islamofascists while whitewashing genuine anti-Semitic and racist hate speech, the Antisemitism-enabling Denial League argues,

Dennis Prager’s argument that Representative-Elect Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress, should not be permitted to take his oath of office on a Koran is, intolerant, misinformed and downright un-American.

Prager is flat-out wrong when he asserts that Representative Ellison’s use of a Koran would be “damaging to the fabric of American civilization.” To the contrary, the U.S. Constitution guarantees that, “no religious test shall ever be required” to hold public office in America.

On the contrary, Dennis Prager’s argument that Representative-Elect Keith Ellison, the first Islamofascist elected to Congress, should not be permitted to take his oath of office on a Koran is well-informed and patriotic. Prager is 100 percent correct that Ellison’s use of a Koran, in the context of Ellison’s other associations and activities, would be damaging to the fabric of American civilization. We regard it as an attack on Civilization as a whole.

We agree 100 percent that no religious test should ever be required for any purpose in this country, except as a prerequisite to serve as a member of the clergy. (One would of course expect a rabbi to be Jewish and a priest to be Catholic.) When Islam goes beyond a means of relating to God and becomes a vehicle for overthrowing societies and civilizations, however, it becomes sedition and treason. There is now a very strong case for requiring all members of Congress to take a public oath stating that their loyalty to the Constitution of the United States will supersede and override all other loyalties during the performance of their duties. Any legislator who is unable to put the Constitution first does not belong in any position of trust or responsibility in our country.

From what we have seen, it is quite possible that Keith Ellison would be unable to put the Constitution first. While he cannot control the piglike (we use the porcine reference as an intentional insult) noises from Jaafar Sheikh Idris and his fellow scum at the North American Imams Federation, he can choose whether or not to associate with these individuals and organizations. His choice to associate with our country’s de facto albeit not de jure domestic enemies suggests very strongly that he is one of them. In Jaafar Sheikh Idris’ own words:

Secularists in the West will agree with this, then they will point out that under Islamic law, people are not all equal. No non-Muslim, for example, could become the president. Well, in response to that fact, in turn, secularism is no different. No Muslim could become president in a secular regime, for in order to pledge loyalty to the constitution, a Muslim would have to abandon part of his belief and embrace the belief of secularism — which is practically another religion. For Muslims, the word ‘religion’ does not only refer to a collection of beliefs and rituals, it refers to a way of life which includes all values, behaviors, and details of living.

Secularism cannot be a solution for countries with a Muslim majority, for it requires people to replace their God-given beliefs with an entirely different set of man-made beliefs. Separation of religion and state is not an option for Muslims because is requires us to abandon God’s decree for that of a man.

If Ellison is with this Hitler in a headscarf, he is against the United States and we do not want him to have the authority to write parking tickets, let alone our country’s laws. According to WorldNetDaily, Ellison is indeed with Hitler in a headscarf.

A black convert to orthodox Sunni Islam, Ellison spoke to the North American Imams Federation, or NAIF, at the group’s Nov. 19 conference in Minneapolis.

His talk flowed into a breakout session listed on the agenda simply as “American Open University,” according to the conference program. It turns out the university is a “distance-learning” center based in Alexandria, Va., and known to local law enforcement as “Wahhabi Online.”

…American Open University supports Sharia, or Islamic law. And its founder and chairman, Jaafar Sheikh Idris, has denounced the U.S system of democracy as “the antithesis of Islam” and argued no man has the right to make laws outside Allah’s laws expressed in the Quran.

While Jaafar Sheikh Idris speaks only for a tiny fringe minority of individuals who identify themselves as Muslims, he has said openly that democracy is the enemy of his version of Islam. Since the United States is a democracy (rule by consent of those governed), Idris’ version of Islam is therefore the enemy of the United States, and the same applies to anyone who lines up on his side–as Ellison seems to be doing.

While showing up at a Ku Klux Klan meeting does not necessarily make one a Klansman, it is well known that birds of a feather tend to flock together. Keith Ellison’s additional association with Louis Farrakhan shows that he is in fact “one of them” and is therefore unfit to hold any position of public trust in this country.

Now to the Antisemitism-enabling Denial League: We disrespectfully request that you add our name to your denunciation of Dennis Prager. It’s spelled “Bill Levinson” (webmaster of Omdurman.org). We had no use for you after you rolled onto your back like a cheap prostitute and whitewashed the hate speech in MoveOn.org’s Action Forum, thus showing that your loyalty to the Democratic Left supersedes your own stated reason for existence: opposing anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry. Your condemnation of Prager reinforces our perception that ADL is part of the problem and not the solution.