We are speaking of the Green Plague of militant “Islam,” a deadly and contagious ideology. The Black Plague was a physical disease, while the Green Plague is a lethal ideology that has probably killed as many if not more people than bubonic plague ever did. The primary vector for the Black Plague consisted of plague-carrying rats, while the Green Plague spreads via mullahs, imams, and Saudi oil money such as Al-Waleed bin Talal’s $20 million donations to Georgetown University and Harvard University.

Of all the world’s major religions, there is only one that advocates and promotes disloyalty to the country of which one is a citizen.
Hindus are loyal citizens of their countries of residence. English and American Hindus, for example, are loyal to England and America respectively. Hinduism does not even seek converts, as one has to be born into a caste to be a Hindu.
Jews assimilate into their surrounding societies, and Judaism does not seek converts either.
Confucism, Buddhism, and Taoism are philosophies of self-improvement that do not focus on any kind of deity.
Christianity seeks converts, but Jesus took care of the “divided loyalties” issue up front: “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar, and to God that which is God’s.” He added that his kingdom “was not of this world.”
Militant “Islam,” however, makes a very secular distinction between the Dar-el-Islam (House of Islam) and the Dar-el-Harb (House of War). In contrast to Jesus’ kingdom, which is “not of this world,” militant “Muslims” are members of the umma (community) of Islam, while all non-Muslims are part of the “House of War,” i.e. enemies to be subjugated, converted by force, or killed. Although militant “Islam” is not an agency of any single hostile foreign power like Iran or Saudi Arabia–Shiite Iranians and Sunni Saudis hate each others’ versions of Islam–it is often backed by the such countries for the purpose of undermining the West.

Contrary to assertions by anti-Semites at Stormfront.org, MoveOn.org, and similar hate organizations, one will find very few American Jews who say they are more loyal to Israel than to the United States. (Those who do feel that way often emigrate and become Israeli citizens.) American Jews support Israel for the same reason that American Gentiles support Israel; it is a democratic nation like the United States, and its enemies–theocracies, despotic monarchies, and dictatorships–have been the traditional enemies of the United States. After all, Americans rebelled against a monarchy with far more freedoms and liberties than those enjoyed in most Islamic nations today.

There is also a well known saying, “Follow the money.” In the business world, it’s often considered improper for a supplier to give a gift of significant value (i.e. more valuable than an advertising novelty like a company pen) to a purchasing agent, because the gift could be construed as dividing the buyer’s loyalty between his employer and the supplier who gave him the gift. On the other hand, it’s hard to envision how a gift from the buyer to the supplier could reflect on the buyer’s loyalty to his employer. The fact that some American Jews give money TO Israel, an ally, can hardly be construed as evidence that Israel can influence their decisions.

On the other hand, someone who takes money FROM a foreign power can indeed be suspected of divided loyalties. Israeli money is not influencing our universities or other institutions, but Arab oil money virtually permeates them. Georgetown University and Harvard University both accepted $20 million from Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia. In 2006, Georgetown hosted a conference of the International Solidarity Movement despite receiving proof of the group’s contacts with Hamas terrorists. Later that year, Georgetown told an Evangelical Christian group that it was no longer welcome to use the university’s facilities:

“Now I’ve seen derecognition letters before, but this one takes the cake,” David French, the senior legal counsel for the ADF, said of the Georgetown University decision. “Blessings and may God’s peace be on you! … Now get off campus!”

He told WND that there’s been no satisfactory explanation for the sudden change in school policy, but those in a position to know best say the groups, such InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, are too evangelical.

“The real interesting thing is that Georgetown tossed these groups, but left the Muslim Student Alliance and the Jewish Student Alliance intact,” French told WND. “This Christian college is giving more religious freedom to Muslims and Jews than to Christians.”

We are quite frankly surprised that, given Al-Waleed bin Talal’s evident influence at Georgetown, that the Jewish group was allowed to remain either. Then again, removing the Sunday people before going after the Saturday people is entirely consistent with terms like “divide and conquer” and “defeat in detail.” We hope the Jewish Student Alliance spoke up when they came for the Evangelical Christians, because they will be coming for the Jews next. There is little doubt in our mind that the removal of Christian organizations from an ostensibly Christian university had to do with the new “Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.” (As stated by Al-Waleed bin Talal, this understanding is very simple in Saudi Arabia: there are no Christians, period.)

“The Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding is concerned with Islam and the West and Islam in the West. The Center, since its creation in 1993, has built bridges of understanding between the Muslim world and the West, addressing stereotypes of Islam and Muslims and issues and questions such as the clash of civilizations, and the compatibility of Islam and modern life - from democratization and pluralism to the status of women, minorities and human rights - and American foreign policy in the Muslim world.”

-John L. Esposito

Our perception of the Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding is somewhat different:

Now let’s proceed to the issue of “addressing stereotypes of Islam and Muslims and issues and questions such as the clash of civilizations, and the compatibility of Islam and modern life” by letting the militant Muslims and vectors of the Green Plague speak for themselves. The following survey is from the Pew Research Center.

Say it: Divided loyalties and foreign allegiances. At least two out of every five American Muslims, and more like three out of five of those under thirty, says that his or her primary loyalty is not to the United States, but to a foreign ideology. In this YouTube video, meanwhile, the Green Plague desecrates an American flag. Yes, they have a first Amendment right to do it, but it shows them for exactly what they are: fifth columnists and enemies of the free nation they happen to infest.

Matters are even worse in European countries that are infested by militant “Islamic” guest workers and citizens in name only:

In this video, vectors of the Green Plague: shout “Allah akbar,” “Kill, kill, Denmark,” and “We want Danish blood.”

Again, this is in very strong contrast to Christians who believe in a kingdom “not of this world,” thus allowing them to keep their religious and secular loyalties separate–a principle that was stressed by at least two well-known Christian monarchs.

Every subject’s duty is the king’s; but every subject’s soul is his own.
–Henry V of England

I must be served with life and limb, with house and wealth, with honour and conscience, everything must be committed except eternal salvation–that belongs to God–but all else is mine.
–Frederick William I of Prussia

The militant “Muslim,” on the other hand, makes no secret of his principal loyalty to his hate-filled ideology at the expense of his country and surrounding society, as shown by these images from the Islamic Thinkers Society.

Islamic Thinkers Society: USA means “Under Satanic Administration.”

Islamic Thinkers Society makes no secret of its traitorous plans for the United States

Divided loyalties and foreign allegiances. It’s past time to talk about them, because they are a very real menace to Civilization itself.