|
|||||||||
|
|
The Iraq War: “Necessary” is open to debate. “Just” is not. The Left has been denouncing the Bush Administration’s invasion of Iraq, which the MoveOn.org community has called a war “for Israel.” Leftists have even called for President Bush’s impeachment followed by criminal prosecution, while conveniently forgetting how people in their own camp like John Kerry and Hillary Clinton accused Saddam Hussein of having or acquiring weapons of mass destruction. While the necessity of the war and the manner in which it is now being waged are subjects for debate, its justice is not– at least not for anyone to whom the phrase “Never again” is more than empty talk. In the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust, in which about ten million people were murdered for being Jews, Polish Catholics, Gypsies, Slavs, or other so-called undesirables, the world resolved, “Never again.” We have seen that “never again” does not apply to Cambodians, Rwandans, Ugandan Christians, Sudanese Christians, and so on. Leftists who accuse the United States of “illegally” invading another country while demanding President Bush’s impeachment apparently think “never again” does not mean Kurds or Iraqis either. Genocide and crimes against humanity are acceptable to the Left, while the use of armed force to terminate those activities are not. “Criminal Against Humanity” by L. Paul Bremer (Wall Street Journal, November 6 2006, A14) reports,
This sounds exactly like what the Nazis did to Jews before they built gas chambers and crematoria, but the Michael Moore and MoveOn.org wing of the Democratic Party seem to think “Never again” means “Never again unless Republicans and centrist Democrats like ‘Jew Lieberman’ are the ones intervening to stop it.” The article continues,
Yet, according to the strident Howard Dean/ Michael Moore/ MoveOn.org branch of the Democratic Party, the United States violated international law and committed a war crime by using force to put a stop to this sort of thing. Meanwhile,
Nonetheless, here is what Michael Moore has to say in his own words while accusing President Bush of killing 2800 American troops by sending them to Iraq. Per the following, we suspect that Jabba the Moore carves a notch in his desk every time we lose a man or woman in uniform, so we are not sure what he is complaining about.
While John Kerry and Dick Durbin help the enemy recruit more terrorists by comparing our troops to Nazis and accusing them of “terrorizing” Iraqis, they find it convenient to ignore the following as reported by Bremer:
The necessity of the 2003 invasion of Iraq is a reasonable subject for discussion, as is the manner in which the war against the terrorists is now being waged. Our position is that the Bush Administration’s policy of restraining our troops from responding to terrorist attacks with the kind of force that would not have even been questioned during the World Wars is costing us unnecessary casualties, as is the lack of proper armor and equipment. The same goes for second-guessing and even court-martialing soldiers who, while acting in good faith and reasonable fear for their safety or that of other soldiers, kill suspected insurgents. As shown above, however, the inherent justice of the invasion of Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein from power is not debatable except by those to whom genocide is still an acceptable activity, at least if it is done by enemies of the United States. |
||||||||
Image credits and copyright