Omdurman.org
Defending Western Civilization
Home
Royalty-free leaflets
Royalty-free cartoons





The Spanish Inquisition was right about Islamofascists

The Spanish Inquisition was one of history’s most monstrous institutions but the monster was entirely an Islamofascist creation. More specifically, Islamofascist behavior created the need for the Inquisition, along with modern airport security checkpoints, Israel’s security wall, and the controversial Patriot Act. The only problem with the Inquisition was that the monster soon turned on innocent people and perpetuated religious hatred and intolerance. Furthermore, even a broken clock is right twice a day, the Inquisition was right about Hitler in a Headscarf, and perhaps that one aspect of the Inquisition is worthy of imitation today.

An understanding of the Inquisition requires some knowledge of the medieval feudal system. Under feudalism, people gave their primary loyalty not to their country but to their local overlord. If, for example, their duke revolted against their king, they would probably obey their duke’s orders and not their king’s. If the Church excommunicated their king, they would refuse to obey him. The Church’s interdict against Henry II after the murder of Thomas Becket compelled the King of England to dress in sackcloth and submit to a flogging from a monk. Queen Elizabeth I was later compelled to outlaw Catholicism because the Church urged her Catholic subjects to overthrow her while her country was at war with Spain. Islamic rulers could, of course, make similar appeals to Muslims in Christian nations. Hence the Inquisition.

Spain, or more precisely the kingdoms of Castile and Aragon, was once a relatively-pluralistic state in which Catholics lived harmoniously with Jews and Muslims. Rodrigo del Bivar (El Cid, “The Lord”) had close Muslim friends with whom he fought Islamofascists from North Africa. After Spain recaptured southern Iberia (Andalusia, Granada, and Gibraltar) from the Moors, it was however confronted with the spectre of an ideologically-hostile population that could turn on it at any time.

The Inquisition’s initial purpose was to ethnically-cleanse the regions of all whose principal loyalty was to militant “Islam” and who might aid subsequent invasions from North Africa. In other words, the Inquisition was created for the right reasons and it initially did the right things. The problem was that it provided a convenient mechanism for confiscating property and settling private grudges (as dramatized in Captain from Castile) and it soon turned into an uncontrollable monster that even Spain’s monarchs could not control. It also had to perpetuate its own existence after it ran out of Islamofascists and it did so by persecuting loyal and productive Spanish Jews and Moors. Even Catholics were not immune to arrest, torture, and execution. A false accusation of being a Jew, Muslim, witch, or heretic was a very convenient way to dispose of an inconvenient neighbor and possibly acquire his property in the bargain. In summary, Islamofascism made the Inquisition a necessary evil that soon transformed itself into an uncontrollable and complete evil.

Today, European and North American Islamofascists profess openly their intention to convert the countries they now infest into Islamofascist theocracies. There is in fact a need today for institutions and procedures with the same original and laudable purpose of the Spanish Inquisition: to identify all such aliens, revoke their visas, and expel them from the countries they now infest.

Even the most reprehensible statements are not, however, cause for revoking the citizenships of those that are actually U.S. citizens. Their continued presence must be tolerated but they should be denied jobs and housing whenever possible. While it is illegal to discriminate against anyone for his race or religion, I do not see why any employer or landlord is obliged to accept someone who advocates the overthrow of the United States Constitution and the imposition of Sharia (Islamofascist law) that sanctions, among other things, domestic violence and stoning women to death for “adultery.” It is quite legal to discriminate against someone because of his or her voluntary behavior, and Islamofascists, while homo sapiens by birth, are subhuman by choice.

Islamofascism is a menace to Civilized Humanity

As described by “In No Uncertain Terms” (Mortimer Zuckerman, U.S. News & World Report, March 20 2006), a video message on Hamas’ Web site says, “We are a nation that drinks blood, and we know that there is no blood better than the blood of the Jews.” This is more than ample reason for the Israeli Army to shoot all Hamas members on sight, including “Palestine’s” new so-called government. Hamas is in an openly-declared state of war with Israel and you are allowed to kill the enemy during wartime. Open season should be declared with bounties for dead Hamas, much as bounties were once given for the extermination of pest animals and varmints. Kill them all and let Allah sort them out.

“In No Uncertain Terms” adds that Khaled Mashal, the top leader of Hamas, added, “The nation of Islam will sit at the throne of the world… Muhammed is gaining victory in Palestine [and] Iraq. …The Arab and Islamic nation is rising and awakening. …Tomorrow we will lead the world.” Hamas’ leader in Gaza, Mahmoud al-Zahar, elaborated, “We are part of the great world plan whose name is the world Islamic movement.”

We recall an individual who said, “Today Germany, tomorrow the world” and a bullet through his head during the 1930s would have saved thirty million or so innocent lives, including those of about seven million Germans. The Central Intelligence Agency, Mossad, and MI-5 should learn from history and consider this solution to the Hamas problem quite seriously (with appropriate sanction and oversight by their respective governments). As terrorists, Hamas should be considered an outlaw organization anyway– that is, outside the law’s protection. When someone was “outlawed” in medieval times, it meant that anyone was free to kill him and the same should apply to Hamas, Al Qaida, Hezbollah, and similar organizations.

Hamas and Hezbollah are working with Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. At a terrorist conference in Damascus, they said that the Palestinian conflict would become a focal point in “the final war between Islam and the West.” We previously called for a CrUSAde (you can’t have a Crusade without the USA) and, since Islamofascism has declared war on the West, the West should give them one. Hold high the Cross, Star of David, Hindu Dharma Wheel, and even the Crescent of mainstream Islam and follow Ann Coulter’s advice to invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, meanwhile, told the Palestinians that Iran’s financial aid was conditional on continuation of the terror campaign against Israel. Israel would quite likely be within its rights to give an order to the Mossad and have this individual killed along with Ahmadinejad for promoting the murder of Israeli civilians but Israel is unfortunately not willing to take the harsh measures that heads of state must take to protect their citizens, as described by William Shakespeare:

Sword, hold thy temper, heart be wrathful still
Priests pray for enemies but princes [must] kill.

We cite the Polish hero Jarema Wisniowiecki as a role model whom Israel and indeed all civilized nations should emulate:

It was clear to them [the Cossack messengers] that Khmyelnitski did not wish to risk a battle at present with such a celebrated leader [Wisniowiecki] and that instead of marching against him with his whole strength, he was trying to create delay, and pretending humility, evidently in the expectation that the forces of the prince [Wisniowiecki] would be worn out by long marches and by battles and encounters with various Cossack detachments; in a word he was evidently very much afraid of the prince.
…[Wisniowiecki concluded] “The cunning of this enemy is great! He either thinks that he will lull me to sleep with this letter in order to attack a sleeping man, or he is trying to entice me into the heart of the Commonwealth, finish up the business there, and receive pardon from the King and from the Diet [Sejm]…”
…[After consulting his officers, Wisniowiecki] …then turned to the Colonel of the Tartar bodyguard. “Colonel Vyershul, order your Tartars to behead these Cossacks; but to cut a stake for their leader and impale him at once.”
…”This must be done in return for the cruelty which they practiced on the other side of the Dnieper; and to maintain our dignity and for the welfare of the whole Commonwealth. It must be shown by such an example that there is someone who is not afraid of this bandit leader [Khmyelnitski], and who will treat him as a highwayman…

(Henryk Sienkiewicz, With Fire and Sword)

Here is what Wisniowiecki had to say about the so-called peace process; just replace Khmyelnitski with “Arafat” and Cossacks with “Palestinains” and you will get the idea.

The lord of Bratslav told the prince [Wisniowiecki] that the negotiations had begun… he hoped to soothe and pacify Khmyelnitski. In conclusion, he begged the prince not to deal too severely with the Cossacks, and to give up as much as possible all warlike undertakings until the close of the negotiations.
Had one announced to the prince that his whole Dnieper country was devastated; that all the cities had been razed to the ground, it would not have wounded him so deeply as did this letter.
…”I would not live in this Commonwealth, for I should be ashamed. The Cossack ‘blacks,’ the peasantry, have flooded the country with blood; united with the Heathen [Crimean Tartars] against their own mother. The hetmans are beaten, the armies destroyed, the glory of the nation trampled underfoot. Authority is overcome, the churches burned down, the priests, the nobles slain, the women ravished; and upon these ruins, this dishonor, at the sight of which our ancestors would have died— what does the Commonwealth answer? With the traitor, with her despoilers, with the allies of the Heathen she enters into negotiations and promises them satisfaction. O God, let me die, I repeat, for we can no longer live in the world who feel the dishonor of the mother country and bring our lives to her as a sacrifice.”

It is past time to call the situation what it is– a war– and to use the language of war to dehumanize the enemy, a picture of which appears here.
Butcher kafirs

We conclude with some useful acronyms and descriptions for the bad guys:

Hitler in a Headscarf (from Michael Savage)
Filth in a Dirty Nightshirt (also Michael Savage?)
Vermin in a Turban
Sand Nazi (lives in sand, behaves like a Nazi)
Sand Ape (lives in sand, behaves like an ape– actually, worse than an ape)

Hitler in a Headscarf

TPB = Typical Palestinian Behavior. Mindless violence against fellow Arabs and Muslims as well as Jews, Christians, and gay people. “Honor killings of women who are raped are examples of TPB.”

RBP = Ruined By Palestinians. “The greenhouses that were given to the Palestinians so they could raise food were RBP as soon as the Palestinians took control of Gaza.”

RED = Raghead Exclusion Device (or Raghead Exclusion Door). The armored door that seals off a commercial jetliner’s cockpit from the passenger compartment for the purpose of preventing TPB (or its equivalent by Saudi Arabians) of the kind that took place on 9/11.*

TAT = Typical Arab Treachery (or Typical Arab Taqqiya). “The fact that Palestinians engage in TPB almost as soon as the ink is dry on the treaties they sign is TAT.”

NAM = Non-Assimilable Muslim.
This sand Nazi wants to force the society that it has infested to become Muslim and adopt Sharia law. The NAM believes that Sharia gives it a right to batter its wife as long as it doesn’t break any bones.

Islam is a Religion.
Islamofascism is a Plague. Burn it out and keep it out.


Image credits and copyright