|
|||||||||
|
|
Fundamentalist Islam, the ISM, and Scientology Is the International Solidarity Movement a manipulative cult that can brainwash its recruits to the extent that they will, for example, stand in front of moving bulldozers to gain the senior members’ approval? A comparison of the International Solidarity Movement to Scientology (as described by a young woman who succeeded in going “offline”) and fundamentalist Islam shows that all three organizations use similar methods to control their members. Let’s begin with some characteristics of cults. The following seem to apply to the International Solidarity Movement, Scientology, and/or fundamentalist Islam. (1) The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader… (2) Dissent, doubt, questions, and even attempts to leave the organization are discouraged or punished. See Charlotte Kates’ comments on Scientology here. “I really see the EPF as a means of stripping people’s identity and independence from them, making them malleable, and creating a Scientologist capable of doing anything in the name of Scientology, able to disconnect from family without regret, able to serve on the RPF, able to blame himself or herself for all the wrongs he or she suffers without once blaming Scientology.” Of course, apostasy is punishable by death under militant “Islam,” and people who break free of Scientology are denounced as infiltrators or religious bigots. We assume that anyone who tries to leave the ISM is punished by derision, ostracism, and so on. (3) The group presents itself as being on a special, “chosen” mission to save humanity or a portion of humanity. Outsiders are derided as inferior, evil, and perhaps even worthy of extermination– a classic symptom of the organizational dysfunction known as groupthink. The International Solidarity Movement is on a “special mission” to save the Palestinians, Scientology wants to “clear the planet” and fight Evil Galactic Overlord Xenu, and fundamentalist Islam wants to bring the entire world into the Dar-el-Islam, the House of Submission. The ISM refers to its opponents as Zionists and neocons (code for Jewish conservatives). Fundamentalist Islam, of course, refers to non-Muslims as infidels, kafirs, apes (Jews) and swine (Christians) who abide in the Dar-el-Harb (House of War). (4) The group contends that its goals justify whatever methods it takes to achieve them. The International Solidarity Movement has used the term, “by any means necessary” and taqqiya, or lying and deception, are acceptable in Islamofascism. The same goes for terroristic violence and mass murder. Bob Penny adds regarding Scientology,
(5) The group isolates members from family and friends, and installs itself as the member’s surrogate “family” and social network. This may be achieved through love bombing:
It is quite likely that ISM recruits are given this kind of attention and, as described above, it need not be sexual to get results. Young men are surrounded by seemingly-adoring women, much as the Old Man of the Mountains (the leader of the Assassins or Hashisheen) provided his drugged followers with female attention in a garden that was described as the Islamic paradise. Young women are similarly provided with male attention; we are quite sure that Rachel Corrie was bombarded daily with compliments and praise for everything she was doing for “The Cause.” This exploits the basic human need for affinity and affection, and may be sufficiently powerful to evoke reckless behavior such as standing in front of moving bulldozers. Lee Kaplan’s The ISM is a cult and not to be tolerated shows the above principle at work in detail. The member is isolated from his/her family and friends. He/she is encouraged to associate only with ISM members, just as Charlotte Kates’ testimony shows how Scientology seeks to isolate members from the outside world. Close attention must be paid to the organization’s efforts to distance the recruit from her parents.
In both cases, we see how the cult controls the member by cutting
off his/her contacts with family members and friends. The cult becomes
the member’s new “family” and fills his/her need for affinity
completely. The cult member then becomes willing to do almost anything
to win the cult’s approval. Perhaps this is why Rachel Corrie was willing to kneel in front of a moving bulldozer, below the driver’s line of sight.
Cults can be deadly. WhyAreTheyDead.net contends that Scientology kills. It is well known that fundamentalist Islam kills; it’s your one-stop shopping for pestilence, famine, war, and death. Finally, association with the International Solidarity Movement left Rachel Corrie dead and it could easily kill others as well. When you are more useful to your friends dead than alive, it is time to find new friends… quickly.
What is truly terrifying is that the ISM and Scientology may merge into a single entity whose mission will be to demand the Right of Return for all those PalestinThetan souls that were trapped in volcanos by Evil Galactic Overlord Zionu and his Evil Zionists! |
||||||||
Image credits and copyright