|
|||||||||
|
|
The Second Amendment: America's Other Department of Homeland Security The recent shooting attack in which a fundamentalist Muslim followed terrorist leaders’ pleas to “carry the war to the United States” underscores the importance of our Constitution’s Second Amendment: the right to own weapons for defense of home, family, and country. If the terrorists plan to behave here as they feel free to behave in largely-disarmed Europe, the Second Amendment must become our “other” Department of Homeland Security. This article’s purpose is to demonstrate to even the most ardent rank-and-file gun control supporters that the anti-Second Amendment’s leaders are dishonest and hypocritical at best (their attitude being that gun laws are for the commoners and not themselves) and convicted criminals at worst. We would be prepared to offer expert testimony in any court that the Brady Campaign (formerly Handgun Control Inc.) has issued statements that are incompetent and inaccurate at best and border on fundraising fraud at worst: soliciting money on the basis of willfully fraudulent and deceptive statements. The gun control movement, in fact, uses the quasi-legal and nonviolent equivalent of the militant Arabs’ anti-Israel strategy: lying about the extent of its aims (abolition of the Second Amendment as opposed to “reasonable” gun control laws, just as the Arabs want to destroy Israel and not just get some land for the Palestinians), incrementalism, and the nonviolent equivalent of terrorism: frivolous lawsuits against firearm manufacturers. As shown by the destruction of the Million Mom March, the proper answer consisted of the legal and nonviolent equivalent of total war: destroying the enemy totally instead of fending off his attacks month after month and year after year. Israel must similarly answer Hezbollah’s violent terrorism with genuine total war. This is absolutely not, by the way, a push for the National Rifle Association. Although we have a life membership in said organization, we have not contributed money to it for years. We do not believe that the NRA gives much bang for the buck in terms of effectiveness. Although the NRA complained and preached to the choir about the Million Mom March holding a “thinly-disguised campaign rally” for Albert Gore in 2000, an activity for which 501(c)(3) tax-exempt money was used, it fell to us to put this information to practical use by breaking the Million Mom March’s back with a devastating scandal. Not only that, the NRA failed to follow up on this golden opportunity with the political equivalent of a pursuit to the death that should have devastated the gun control movement (and the career of every politician associated with it) for all time. In any event, if we can question whether we are getting our money’s worth from the NRA, gun control supporters can seriously rethink the wisdom of giving time, money, and/or votes to proven liars, frauds, and even criminals. Now back to the incident that prompted this opinion piece. ADL tells Jews to run and hide because of domestic terrorism Per Moshe Finberg, Chairman, Bnai Elim,
Now we remember why we have such little use for the Anti-Defense League: this is the same batch of Kumbaya-singers that supports gun laws like those enacted to disarm Jews in Nazi Germany and thus facilitates exactly the same kind of terroristic violence that took place last Friday.
Well, ADL-supported gun control laws didn’t do Pam Waechter much good. They didn’t keep her alleged assailant from obtaining a gun or misusing it. On the other hand, the mentality of the ADL and its fellow travelers doubtlessly helped assure that no one at the Jewish Federation bulding was in a position to stop the terrorist’s murderous rampage by putting a bullet in his head. While Washington is, as we understand, among those states that will issue concealed-carry permits to law-abiding citizens, the Jewish Left’s anti-Second Amendment propaganda helps hold down the number of law-abiding citizens who will actually serve as our nation’s second line of defense through responsible ownership of firearms.
How the gun control movement helped cause the 9/11 disaster
Forty or fifty years ago, most American men would have known what to do upon seeing a hijacker slit a female flight attendant’s throat with a box cutter. A box cutter is unlikely to stop an able-bodied adult human male or even hurt him very badly and, as the hijackers were outnumbered, they should have been beaten to bloody pulps or even to death. They should not have survived long enough to enter the cockpits and kill not only everyone aboard but 3000 other people. Only in the politically-correct 2000s can four or five punks with boxcutters take over an entire airplane, because the politically-correct Kumbaya-singers taught Americans not to fight back. We have tried it their way long enough, a conclusion underscored even further by the fact that Great Britain, which outlaws nearly all private ownership of firearms, is now the most violent industrialized nation on earth. Britain’s streets are essentially ruled by droogs from A Clockwork Orange, and no law-abiding citizen dares fight back because they and not the criminal will be sent to prison. Jeff Cooper’s excellent book To Ride, Shoot Straight, and Speak the Truth sums up the entire problem in two paragraphs.
Cooper goes on to describe how two hijackers tried to take over an Air Iberia flight from Madrid to Rome. “The passengers killed them, the stewardesses covered them up with blankets, and opened the bar.” (What’s Spanish for “Now Comes Miller Time?”) “More recently a troll seized a girl in a Philippine bank, doused her with gasoline, and threatened to burn her if he was not given all the ready money. The customers not only beat him to death, they actually dismembered him.” The fact that something like this did not happen on all four airplanes the instant the hijackers began to slit the flight attendants’ throats shows just how much damage the anti-Second Amendment Left has done to our country’s culture and values. Cooper, by the way, has no television-induced ideas about violence being glamorous or desirable. As a Marine Corps officer during the Second World War, he doubtlessly had plenty of opportunities to see what real firearms do to human bodies and anyone who has experienced that doubtlessly agrees with General Sherman’s observation that war is hell. Cooper may also have seen what the Japenese did to civilians in the Philippines and prisoners of war from Bataan, either of which would have driven home a vital lesson: The only things worse than winning a war all come with losing it. What part of “For defense of home, family, and country” does the Left not understand? By way of comparison, the renowned Tower musket could fire a maximum of six rounds per minute with a loose-fitting ball and its effective range was less than half that of a longbow. An enemy soldier had to be very unlucky to be hit by Brown Bess’ projectile at 150 paces, at least by the Redcoat who aimed at him. The Baker rifle (made famous by the Sharpe television series) could hit at 300 or more paces but it used a tight-fitting ball and could fire perhaps one round per minute, and the Pennsylvania or Kentucky Rifle had the same problem. Only the introduction of the von Dreyse breechloading rifle in the early 1840s produced a weapon that was superior to the longbow in all respects. The British Army issued muskets instead of longbows only because it took years of practice to make a longbowman. Recruiting sergeants could, however, go into London’s worst neighborhoods, hire the Duke of Wellington’s “scum of the earth” for a shilling a day, and make them into passable musketeers in a couple of weeks. It is to be noted very clearly, though, that whatever king not only encouraged his subjects to own these highly-lethal weapons but insisted that they practice with them was far less afraid of some medieval Lee Harvey Oswald “voting from the rooftops” than he was of foreign enemies. England’s sovereigns were wise enough to recognize that the longbow allowed them to dominate the battlefields of western Europe as thoroughly as Poland’s winged hussars ruled those in the east.
The ADL is part of the problem
ADL must therefore be regarded as part of the problem, as underscored by its advice that “Jewish institutions, including synagogues, to cancel services and evacuate the buildings…” In other words, ADL’s position is that American Jews cannot exercise their First Amendment right to assemble peacefully and practice their religion because some fundamentalist Muslim is likely to walk into the event and “carry the war to the United States.” This underscores yet another point: the Second Amendment helps guarantee the First Amendment and the rest of the Bill of Rights. The Union for Reform Judaism, formerly known as the Union of American Hebrew Congregations (a double oxymoron, there is very little Hebrew or American about it) also is part of the problem. Its leader Eric Yoffie wants to sing Kumbaya with the terrorists, and he also gave a campaign speech for Albert Gore at the May 2000 Million Mom March in Washington. Although 501(c)(3) organizations are not allowed to attempt to influence elections, Yoffie exhorted his listeners, “we’re going to find out who’s getting NRA funds, and benefiting from NRA ads, and we’re going to vote for the other guy.” “The American people, I believe, are ready for a leader who will take on the fanatics and support sensible gun control.” Yoffie continued his unique interpretation of Judaism as follows. “Controlling guns is not only a political matter, it is a solemn religious obligation. Our gun-flooded society has turned weapons into idols, and the worship of idols must be recognized for what it is-blasphemy.” The bottom line is that Yoffie may not only misused 501(c)(3) tax exempt money (if UAHC paid for his expenses to tout Al Gore at the Million Mom March) but he is obviously a liar. There is nothing in Jewish tradition that supports gun control; in fact, had the Maccabees practiced sword control, there would be no Jewish religion because we would all be worshipping real idols just the way Antiochus wanted. There would be no Christian religion either because Jesus would have been an idol-worshipper and not a rabbi. This brings us to our next point: the personal character and integrity of the typical gun control movement leader. You aren’t allowed to own a gun but I am The same goes for columnist Carl Rowan, who said that anyone who possesses a gun should go to jail. He was not even arrested for shooting a trespasser with an unregistered pistol, even though few if any jurisdictions sanction the use of deadly force against someone who is committing at most a nonviolent misdemeanor. (The trespasser was on Rowan’s land but was not trying to invade his home, which would have justified deadly force.) Again, there is one set of gun control laws for Rowan’s kind and another for us commoners and peasants. Representative Cynthia McKinney is yet another typical gun control supporter (and Israel-hater). Any of us would doubtlessly be handcuffed, arrested, and prosecuted for first trying to bypass a security checkpoint and then assaulting a police officer who tried to stop us. Members of Congress are, as shown by McKinney, apparently allowed to try to bypass metal detectors and shove or hit police officers. Criminals (and terrorists) don’t want honest people to own guns
The gun control movement is led by liars
One death per minute times 60 minutes per hour times 24 hours per day times 365 days per year = 525,600 deaths per year, more deaths than our country suffered from the Second World War. The Million Mom March also solicited funds under fraudulent pretenses by telling prospective donors that handgun misuse kills “12 children a day.” Investigation proved that the Million Mom March counted 18- and 19-year olds as children even though they are legally adults. Since this age group is among the highest in terms of violent crime, though, it served to inflate the sensationalistic casualty figure. This is far from the only example of the Brady Campaign’s leaders lying and engaging in taqqiya just like militant Arabs. Michael Bellesiles, the author of Arming America, meanwhile had to resign from Emory University after “evidence of falsification” was discovered. Hollywood and Gun Control As an example, Arnold Schwarzenegger in Commando sneaks up on a friend, pulls a sidearm from his friend’s holster, and points it at him– a stunt that, in real life, would qualify as reckless endangerment or worse. There was a Star Trek episode in which one person let his phaser point at another who complained, “Watch where you point that.” The first replied, “Don’t worry, the safety is on.” Scenes are common in which one character will point a weapon at another without first identifying the target as hostile, and then keeping the weapon pointed at their friend for several seconds afterward. These poor examples on the screen have in fact extended into real-life tragedy; actor John-Erik Hexum was killed by a blank round from a .44 Magnum that was fired too close to his head. Actor Brandon Lee was apparently killed by a live round from a pistol that was thought to contain blanks, while OSHA could probably have written numerous safety violations for the set on which he was performing. These people have no standing, moral or otherwise, to talk to the rest of the country about gun control. The Million Mom March made the mistake of getting caught The Million Mom March’s collapse was almost visible, with other tax-exempt organizations making haste to distance themselves from it the way one might back away from a leper, while its leaders struggled with what is known politely as “damage control.” As shown here, their efforts were not successful.
It is quite likely that the group liquidated because the Internal Revenue Service would have revoked its tax exemption. Furthermore, it is on record that the group’s Form 990 tax return for 2000 contains, to say the least, some very inaccurate information. As with some of the Islamofascist tax-exempt groups we are now investigating, the MMM told the IRS it made no effort to influence legislation despite widespread evidence to the contrary. Hillary Clinton’s central role Nor is Hillary Clinton the only one. Senator Carl Levin (D-IL) is another, as shown here. It is in fact unfortunate that many gun control leaders’ names begin with “Levin,” “Fein,” and so on despite the experiences of German Jews during the 1930s and 1940s, and Israel’s experience in 1947-1948 when Great Britain tried to prevent Jews from obtaining weapons. A Jewish-American for gun control makes as much sense as an Irish-American for potato blight but Dianne Feinstein, Carl Levin, Frank Lautenberg, Charles Schumer, and Feinberg are in the forefront of the gun control movement along with the Senate’s worst Gentile specimens, i.e. John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, and Dick Turban, excuse us, Dick Durbin. In any event, New York’s voters should be reminded of Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the Million Mom March scandal to prevent her from ever becoming President and subordinating the United States to the United Nations, as her husband and George Soros want. CONCLUSION This is the Left’s vision statement for our country:
This is our vision statement. |
||||||||
Image credits and copyright